^{User talk:}Jimfbleak

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Anant Jamloki

@1233 I only want to keep my old articles safe in which I have written true information and these articles have been written by me myself. Now I am not able to understand why efforts are being made to remove them after 3 years. Thank you. Anant Jamloki (talk) 10:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Jamloki, your user page is for you to write about your activities on Wikipedia, so anything else will be deleted. Your article had no in-line independent verifiable sources, no wikilinks, and the text is highly promotional, culminating in enhancing its beauty even more. Further uphill lies a picturesque lake called Nagtal, whose beauty is beyond description. If you post an article, it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I don't understand efforts are being made to remove them after 3 years. Your account is only a year old and your user page and article were both started in 2025 Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:16, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I only wrote what is true and my account is 3 years old, that is a different matter, I might have used it for English later. Anant Jamloki (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Jamloki, whether it is true is irrelevant, we must be able to verify with in-line independent verifiable sources, and some of it was your opinions rather than verifiable facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I do references then will the page remain in good condition? Anant Jamloki (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Jamloki, make sure your refs are in-line, formatted (not bare urls) and independent of the temple, also avoid opinions such as those mentioned above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:14, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks 👍 Anant Jamloki (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aygun Badalova

Hi, I’m new and I’ve created a draft for Aygun Badalova (I’ve disclosed a conflict of interest on my user page). I’d really appreciate any feedback on how to improve it or help it meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Thanks so much! Draygun (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Hendry

Hi Jimfbleak, I saw that you previously deleted the draft of the OpenUp article under G11 for promotional content. I’m currently working on a new version and I want to make sure it follows Wikipedia’s guidelines for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. Could you kindly advise me on what specific improvements or changes are needed to make this page acceptable for publication? I really want to get it right and would appreciate your guidance. Thanks in advance!

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Draft:Louis Armstrong Middle School

I have seen that you reviewed my draft of the Louis Armstrong Middle School. The purpose of this article was to inform readers about the school. In no way was I attempting to advertise the school. Example are with several high schools with wikipedia articles, that have the same sort of content. Schoolwikiwriter69 (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolwikiwriter69 no in-line references to independent third-party sources, no wikilinks, plenty of fact-free promotional claims The school's mission is to bring together a culturally diverse group of students to help them grow academically, emotionally, socially, and physically... to promote racial integration and diversity in education. The school embodies the philosophy that children learn best when they have classmates from different ethnic groups, neighborhoods, and academic abilities. The student body reflects the diversity of Queens,... a robust curriculum... It is known for its accelerated and honors programs... The school has received recognition for its music education program and looks as if it's written by a LLM Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:34, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it is factual though, their entire goal is related to diversity, respect, and they have an accelerated regents program. additionally, the school includes a really good music program. this is factual, i have included references. Schoolwikiwriter69 (talk) 21:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolwikiwriter69, I've reverted your disruptive edits to Nedu Wazobia, which added unreferenced text and random bolding, and removed existing refs. Also read the following regarding writing an article about a school.

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the school, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the school claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your text didn't give any info about the number of employees, students, management structure, funding or expenditure.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your text was basically a prospectus for the school with " this is what we offer" and aims and aspirations instead of real facts.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I didn't check.

You had no wikilinks.

If you really think your unreferenced draft was neutral factual writing, that's a problem. Take your time if you try again, we need neutral factual text with independent third-party sources, and anything close to the last effort may get you blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ahh, i understand now, thank you Schoolwikiwriter69 (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hum TV programs

Thank you for the deletion of Template:Hum TV programs as the template was an old one and seems promotional to promote the subject. I want to say that remove the text "Template:Hum TV programs", where this template was used on the pages as this template has been deleted. Thank you Mlkfrz4455 (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons