Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 09:18 on 7 February 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 82.37.129.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1337 (Ahecht LTA test filter, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

  The name change is legitimate from what I can see. Izno (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Carlitoscarlos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Despite me having written to him on his talk page (as suggested in the previous report I made), and despite me having listened to his "reasons" and made my latest changes according to his suggestions (see here, here, here and here), the user continues to revert my changes accusing me of "Vodafone LTA vandal". I reiterate once again that:

  1) I am not an LTA

  2) I do not act only on Vodafone pages (see my contributions, I edit pages related to many companies in all sectors, such as technology, telecommunications, insurance, energy and more).

  I ask that he at least be notified on his talk page by an administrator. Thanks. InterComMan (talk) 08:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

  This is not a case of vandalism. You can take your case to WP:ANI. Izno (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)